Search for: "State v. P. B."
Results 2181 - 2200
of 6,784
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
P. 38.1(i); Lairsen v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 3:35 am
On 4 May 2017 the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) delivered its judgment in the case Valsts policijas Rīgas reģiona pārvaldes Kārtības policijas pārvalde v Rīgas pašvaldības SIA ‘Rīgas satiksme’, answering two related questions: ‘(1) Must the phrase ‘is necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the … third… [read post]
18 May 2017, 3:10 pm
Stock image of gavel and law book From Levitt v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:22 pm
§3731(b)(1) begins to run when the cause of action accrues); TRW Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am
Mandel (1972), or Kerry v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:07 pm
The legal standard for the EB1A category is codified in INA Section 203(b)(1)(A) and states that how an applicant may qualify for EB1A classification. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:08 am
Gaines, 346 Or. 160, 171-72, 206 P.3d 1042 (2009).State v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm
Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17-04-02, Gregory P. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:49 pm
at p. 380.) [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:00 am
P. 12(b)(6). [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:01 am
Reed (1971), her majority opinion in the VMI gender discrimination case, United States v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:57 am
See, United States v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:00 am
"** Citing Marro v Bartlett, 46 NY2d 674, the Court of Appeals noted that "[p]rovided it complies with the two criteria set forth in the Constitution, and absent proof that its determination violates statutory prescriptions or promotes a constitutionally impermissible purpose, the Board's authority is not subject to judicial review. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 3:47 am
B. [read post]
2 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 1:16 pm
(Canfield v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:12 am
P. 60(b) & 59(e) motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order dismissing MFR’s patent complaint regarding QR codes for want of prosecution. [read post]
