Search for: "State v. So"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 117,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 12:45 pm
Shortly after the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:28 pm
See Spears v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
First, paraquat is closely regulated for agricultural use in the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:23 am
In P.D. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 8:24 am
Poly-Urethane Indus., 353 So. 2d 646 (Fla. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
(Some media reports state he was holding up a small crucifix.) [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
So now there is a second crime that is hard for most of us to see, at least outside of New York. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Most pertinently, Idaho v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The Court of Chancery recently examined such an agreement in In West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 1:32 pm
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:55 pm
If so, employers should consult with their legal counsel and carefully consider whether to go through with the transfer. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:36 pm
Supreme Court’s 1938 decision in Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
Jackson, which has been consolidated under United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am
Further, applying RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 52 it was possible to disapply the discriminatory parts of the regulations to give JA a remedy without her needing to make a separate human rights claim. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:43 am
Young v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:48 am
In oral argument in the appeal of the latter case, the Supreme Court grappled with how broadly to construe Sarbanes-Oxley’s prohibition on “otherwise obstruct[ing]” an official proceeding (U.S. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
