Search for: "State v. Still" Results 2181 - 2200 of 44,252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2022, 10:57 pm by INFORRM
The actual provision does not guarantee the level of protection that all EU member states should already respect with regard the protection of journalists’ sources in application of Article 10 ECHR as developed and applied in the well-established case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) on this topic (see our blog on Becker v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:55 pm
  Specifically, earlier this week he effectively reviewed the state of the law concerning enforcement of the recently enacted federal Sex Offender Registration Notification Act (SORNA) in US v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
But a question for those who do: Is the long-term upshot of Herring v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:20 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Still waiting on the very ripe cases of Martinez v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:29 am by Steve Shiffrin
There are many horror tales, but still one of the worst is contained in Schneckloth v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 6:03 am by Derek T. Muller
I’ve seen several versions of the claim that Justice Elena Kagan’s opinion in Chiafalo v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:10 pm by James M. Beard
Building the F/V American Finest in the United States was a feel good story about supporting American shipbuilding and the American fisheries. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:10 pm by James M. Beard
Building the F/V American Finest in the United States was a feel good story about supporting American shipbuilding and the American fisheries. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 10:10 am by Jason Mazzone
Unless ratified by all fifty states an amendment depriving one state of an equal vote in the Senate violates Article V. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:33 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) A commenter on the thread about the 1901 case in which the court rejected (on statutory grounds) a prosecution for expelling someone from church based on how he voted writes: It goes almost without saying that religious freedom was not at issue in this case because the First Amendment would not be incorporated against the states until Gitlow v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:30 am by JONATHAN DAVIES AND ELLIOT GOLD
 On one analysis, the correct respondent would still be the chief constable. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
“New York’s economy is expanding but the state is still facing a serious budget gap. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
“New York’s economy is expanding but the state is still facing a serious budget gap. [read post]