Search for: "Thomas v. State"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 13,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2012, 5:42 pm
Conclusion: Andrew V. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:53 am
Thomas: Ineffective assistance of counsel on state collateral review as cause for a procedural default.Martinez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
And the Court issued a per curiam decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:12 am
Justice Thomas dissented, joined by Justice Ginsburg. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:46 pm
Justice Thomas wrote in part:In Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
Thomas v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:10 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court ruling on Vaden V. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 10:12 am
But the anomaly comes from the Fourth District, which centers on the state capital of Springfield. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:23 pm
Justice Kagan also noted the similarity between this case and United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 3:47 pm
Harris v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:59 pm
Ct. 2096 (2006); Thomas v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 12:38 pm
Thomas, 447 F.3d 1191, 1198-99 (9th Cir. 2006); United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 9:48 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 12:45 pm
At today’s oral argument in Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:10 am
The United States filed an amicus brief on Wednesday (October 20th), supporting the petition of false marking defendant, BP Lubricants, to obtain a writ of mandamus compelling dismissal of the suit filed by Thomas Simonian in the North District of Illinois. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58: The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]
28 Jun 2006, 8:22 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:56 pm
Answer: Yes, According to the United States Supreme Court in Watters, Commissioner v. [read post]
