Search for: "Weeks v. United States" Results 2181 - 2200 of 19,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2022, 4:44 am by jonathanturley
There is a major victory for free speech out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit this week. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm by Mark Walsh
In a December case, United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:26 am
In this they may seek to mimic the great economic enterprises, the powerful non-governmental organizations, and the state security and propaganda organs of domestic and foreign governments, friendly or otherwise. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am by Emma Snell
  Weeks after first occupying the major Ukrainian city of Kherson, Russian troops have taken control of the Kherson City Council. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:36 pm by Amy Howe
ShareOn Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Biden v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 1:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The pace of the SPAC-related lawsuits filings has perceptibly picked up on recent weeks; there have been seven SPAC-related suits filed in April alone. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm by Eric Segall
 Prior to the 2000 Supreme Court decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 21 April 2022, the United States, Canada, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea and Chinese Taipei published a declaration establishing the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules Forum. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Teresa Chen, Alana Nance, Han-ah Sumner
In a joint statement, the leaders of AUKUS—Prime Minister Scott Morrison of Australia, Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the United Kingdom, and President Joe Biden—stated that they were committing “to commence new trilateral cooperation on hypersonics and counter-hypersonics, and electronic warfare capabilities, as well as to expand information sharing and to deepen cooperation on defense innovation. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The most egregious whopper is the judge’s contention that there was no need for urgent action when the CDC adopted its rule because at that time the pandemic had been raging in the United States for nearly a year. [read post]