Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 2181 - 2200 of 29,083
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Even if the Court views file-sharing lawsuits as unwise and the statutory penalties a remarkably poor policy judgment, the objectives sought by this suit are well within those contemplated by Congress and the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. s. 101 et seq. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:15 am
The fate of public-sector unions is in the Court’s hands this term as well, and again the Trump administration has urged it to depart from precedent. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 7:19 am by Thomas DeLorenzo
City of New York, the court heard arguments in its first major gun control case since District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:22 am by Joel Goldstein
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm by Colby Pastre
Supreme Court to overturn state tax laws that discriminate against interstate commerce or otherwise impede it, a power Justice Kennedy (as well as Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito) have exercised on occasion. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:28 pm by INFORRM
On 30 August 2011 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice handed down judgment in the case of Baglow v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 1:40 pm
The good new for respondent Matthew Babick and his counsel is that they won at trial, and they win the appeal as well. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:05 am by INFORRM
The matter now returns to the High Court, where Lord Justice Warby has yet to conclude the process of determining how the Duchess is to be compensated for the harm done to her. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:34 pm by Zachary Spilman
His partial dissent begins with quotes from a case found in the first volume of the Military Justice reporter: Courtney v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, earlier this week and with the plaintiffs’ consent, the Department of Justice asked the Court to hold the case in abeyance.Despite the high likelihood that the Supreme Court will not hear Trump v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 10:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Notre Dame law professor Randy Kozel -- a leading scholar of precedent -- was kind enough to pass along this item about this case, which raises important questions about precedent as well as federalism, jurisdiction, and taxation: Last week, the Supreme Court agreed to hear South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:33 pm
  Lots of Justice Segal's opinion makes total sense.Though two quick things:(1) Do you really need a court reporter for ex parte hearings? [read post]