Search for: "50 Doe Defendants" Results 2201 - 2220 of 7,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2011, 4:42 am
This is critical because district court judges routinely order blanket deductions (15%, 50%, 75%) off the prevailing attorneys' lodestar. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Doug Ferguson
In most jurisdictions 50-70% of parties do not have a lawyer, and suffer the consequences of navigating solo the complicated, form heavy, and deadline heavy family court system. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 10:10 am by Cannabis Law Group
The complaint notes that the defendants believed the company to be worth much more than the offer on the table, so they turned it down. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:53 am by Jonathan Marshall
Hamm, 121 N.J. 109 (1990), which states, "The mere use of words such as "detainment," "convicted" and "imprisonment" in N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 does not elevate DWI to a "crime" within the intendment of N.J.S.A. 2C:1-4(a)[ 1 ]... [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 7:42 am by [email protected]
However, theft does not always entail the direct taking of another’s property. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 7:42 am by [email protected]
However, theft does not always entail the direct taking of another’s property. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 2:52 pm by Michael Grossman
To win a civil case in Texas, you must prove that the defendant is more than 50% responsible for the damages. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The issue in this case is defendant was correct in concluding that the Domestic Relations Law does not permit same-sex couples to marry. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:33 am by Russ Bensing
  A very good lawyer was defending a policeman accused of stealing drugs, and it was a very tough case. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:57 am by Dan Lips
” He added that resources to defend systems at the local level are particularly scarce. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
The question is, does A have a valid claim against B to recover a share of the re-sale profits? [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
” In 2017, the parties learned that the original DRO could not be implemented by the defendant’s pension plan, because the defendant had retired on a disability pension in 2001, and that the defendant’s disability pension would not be replaced by a regular service retirement pension when he reached age 62. [read post]