Search for: "B. Smith" Results 2201 - 2220 of 5,330
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 8:49 am by Joe Consumer
Here’s what happened: It was the waning days of World War II, and a B-25 bomber was flying a routine mission ferrying servicemen from Massachusetts to New York City's LaGuardia Airport. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:18 am by Adam Weinstein
Under industry rules, brokers must first discuss all trades with the investor before executing them under NYSE Rule 408(a) and FINRA Rules 2510(b). [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 8:53 am by Wystan Ackerman
Cutting Edge Developments in Class Action Law: Scott Burnett Smith presented on this topic. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 6:01 am by Adam Weinstein
Under industry rules, brokers must first discuss all trades with the investor before executing them under NYSE Rule 408(a) and FINRA Rules 2510(b). [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith has commented extensively about the case. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 10:45 am by Jon Sands
Ye, No. 12-10576 (Friedland with Clifton and NR Smith) --- The Ninth Circuit held that providing false information on a passport application, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
It's been almost a year since my last series of posts on the fallout from Hobby Lobby--in particular, on the challenges by nonprofit organizations to the government's augmented religious accommodation. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 2:15 pm by Edward Smith
Clearly, people aren’t just driving from Point A to Point B and then back from Point B to Point A — traffic flows in more complicated patterns than this. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]