Search for: "BOX v. STATE"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 5,284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2013, 7:34 am
The ACLU is direct counsel in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
Most Ironic Literary Redaction Tie: Ibrahim v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:53 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:16 pm
In a victory for transparency in police use of facial recognition, a New Jersey appellate court today ruled that state prosecutors—who charged a man for armed robbery after the technology showed he was a “possible match” for the suspect—must turn over to the defendant detailed information about the face scanning software used, including how it works, source code, and its error rate.Calling facial recognition “a novel and untested technology,” the court in… [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:53 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:43 am
Downing v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 12:03 pm
CoxIn Sparks v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 1:05 pm
Scott Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:06 am
Recently, the Appellate Division issued an unpublished decision in the matter of Adessa v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
See our “Pandora’s Box” series (Pt 1, Pt 2, Pt 3, Pt 4). [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:54 am
Ackerman v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
Partners, LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 7:46 am
Box 110351 Birmingham, AL 35211 Phone: (205) 853-5703 (V/TTY) Fax: (205) 856-6226 Technet 275 Crockett Circle Florence, AL 35633 Phone: (256) 765-3895 DISABILITY ORGANIZATIONS AIDS Birmingham Aids Outreach, Inc P.O. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 7:01 am
Box 403106 Miami Beach, Florida 33140 Dr. [read post]
28 May 2022, 7:51 am
On the appropriate section of his 2003 to 2009 disclosure forms, however, Justice Thomas checked the box for “none. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 4:32 am
It's part of why I think Trump v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 12:03 pm
If it does, it is constitutionally unprotected.United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 4:20 am
Bank v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:04 am
” Id. at 387 (quoting United States v. [read post]
