Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 12,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2008, 7:30 pm
Three more amicus briefs have been filed in Winter v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:08 pm
Case below: Laster v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm
Supreme Court precedent, the unanimous panel concluded as follows: “Although we agree with Truly Nolen that Concepcion implicitly disapproved the reasoning of the Gentry court, the United States Supreme Court did not directly address the precise issue presented in Gentry. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:47 pm
Recent decisions by both the California and United States Supreme Courts have found that state policies which unduly impede arbitration are invalid. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:06 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
United States, 541 U.S. 600 (2004) [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:23 pm
Mollett v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 9:00 am
Nov. 18, 2022), the Honorable James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a motion to dismiss claims brought against defendants Coca-Cola, Blue Triton Brands, and Niagara Bottling (collectively the “Defendants”) by plaintiff individuals and Sierra Club (“Plaintiffs”). [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:26 am
United States (1976). [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 8:27 am
Or, at a minimum, explain why it comes out 180 degrees differently than the opinion of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 11:41 pm
California and related decisions. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 6:03 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am
Interpreter fees are addressed in California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 9795.3. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
United States, 13-127; Brewington v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 8:32 am
Home Depot USA, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Central District of California – July 20th. 2018) involves a claim of strict product liability and negligence against the defendants related to a fire that broke out in the plaintiff’s garage. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 2:55 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 8:27 am
Co. of State of Pa., __ Cal.4th __ (2010) (2010 Cal.Lexis 11679), the California Supreme Court held that where the insurance policies did not define the term “suit,” there was a duty to defend and indemnify a contractor that settled a government claim in an administrative adjudicative proceeding before the United States Department of Interior Board of Contract Appeals (“IBCA”). [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
Case date: 21 April 2022 Case number: No. 19-55864 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:32 pm
United States, the D.C. [read post]
