Search for: "Doe 103" Results 2201 - 2220 of 3,234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2011, 11:28 am by PaulKostro
., 103 N.J. 591, 607 (1986), the Legislature codified the “best interests of the child” test, providing that DYFS shall initiate a petition to terminate parental rights on the grounds of the “best interests of the child” . . . if the following standards are met: (1) The child’s safety, health or development has been or will continue to be endangered by the parental relationship; (2) The parent is unwilling or unable to eliminate the harm facing the child or is… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:25 am by Matt Osenga
  Does this mean a completely different inventive entity or merely a single change in inventorship? [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:13 am by Dennis Crouch
Notice does not focus on the applicant’s arguments divorced from the examiner’s rejections of record that are actually appealed to the Board. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 8:38 pm by arnoldwadsworth
Even if you have been charged criminally with Domestic Violence, we understand that it does not mean it has occurred. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Taylor’s argument that the examiner misinterpreted the transitional phrase “consisting of” does not help him. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
”[21] The Panel explains that this formulation is desirable because it will provide the courts and litigants with notice of appropriate uses of the legislation, and by doing so, it will deter litigation that does not fall within the appropriate uses.[22] As well, a purpose clause will help litigants differentiate between SLAPPs and non-SLAPPs, the latter of which is subject to the limited remedies for traditional civil actions.[23] An effective purpose clause plays the crucial roles… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Notice does not focus on the applicant’s arguments divorced from the examiner’s rejections of record that are actually appealed to the Board. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:52 am by Stefanie Levine
§§102 and 103 Exception for method, apparatus, technology, computer program product, or system used solely to prepare a tax return; or for financial management. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:52 am by Stefanie Levine
§§102 and 103 Exception for method, apparatus, technology, computer program product, or system used solely to prepare a tax return; or for financial management. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Kyle Krull
So what does that mean for Medicare and Medicaid, especially for folks who dip into both programs? [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Earlier this week, all CSA members except the OSC issued blanket orders to provide interim relief from the new restrictions on registration exemptions for international dealers and international advisers found in the July 2011 amendments to NI 31-103. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Earlier this week, all CSA members except the OSC issued blanket orders to provide interim relief from the new restrictions on registration exemptions for international dealers and international advisers found in the July 2011 amendments to NI 31-103. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am by judith
Indeed, a typical “journal” will most likely look very different years from now than it does today. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am by Conor McEvily
  The Associated Press (via the Sacramento Bee), Michael Doyle of the Kansas City Star, and Adam Liptak of the New York Times all have coverage of the cases, as does Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  The prosecutor had also argued that Pierce waived the issue by not proffering the wife’s statement, but EvidR 103(A)(2) specifically says that a proffer is not required “if evidence is excluded during cross-examination. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
   The ‘103 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Princeton Digital Image v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
   The ‘103 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Princeton Digital Image v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:09 pm by Rantanen
Does that disclosure preclude a third-party disclosure of a 75%-25% mixture? [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:15 am by Kevin LaCroix
The FDIC’s fourteen lawsuits to date involve only 103 directors and officers. [read post]