Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 15,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2020, 8:53 am
The Supreme Court rejected a rule that a “generic.com” term is always generic and also rejected a rule that such a term is automatically non-generic. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 7:22 am
The Manual supplements the uniform citation system for Florida legal documents contained in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.800 and the standard citation authority for American legal journals, the 20th Edition of The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
Put another way, if you’re bringing on unpaid interns to do work in place of regular employees, it’s probably not going to fly. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:50 am
Baron (In re Ondova Ltd. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Zack decried the legal profession’s “continuing slide into the gutter of incivility. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 2:05 am
This comes as no surprise, as 76% of employees say they’re more likely to stay at a job that offers continuous learning and growth opportunities. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:47 pm
It was re-filed a few days later but because the rule allowing re-filing of non-compliant papers back to the original filing date does not apply to motions, the motion was rejected. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
In the interest of continuity, Debtor names Mr. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:25 am
That makes sense, why waste judicial time and resources on a declaratory judgment action involving a will that may never have legal effect. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 10:22 am
Google finalized its $3.1 billion purchase of ad delivery giant DoubleClick Tuesday after European Union regulators ruled that the purchase does not violate anti-monopoly rules in Europe which removed the last legal hurdle for the hotly contested acquisition. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am
Most importantly, in terms of the two-tiered approach to remedial measures and sanctions under Rule 37, the court found that the most serious sanctions under Rule 37(e)(2) would be warranted in this case as, on balance, the evidence establishes that Google acted with intent to deprive the plaintiffs of relevant evidence in allowing the “no history” chat discussions about the case to continue unabated. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am
Most importantly, in terms of the two-tiered approach to remedial measures and sanctions under Rule 37, the court found that the most serious sanctions under Rule 37(e)(2) would be warranted in this case as, on balance, the evidence establishes that Google acted with intent to deprive the plaintiffs of relevant evidence in allowing the “no history” chat discussions about the case to continue unabated. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am
Most importantly, in terms of the two-tiered approach to remedial measures and sanctions under Rule 37, the court found that the most serious sanctions under Rule 37(e)(2) would be warranted in this case as, on balance, the evidence establishes that Google acted with intent to deprive the plaintiffs of relevant evidence in allowing the “no history” chat discussions about the case to continue unabated. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:44 am
For those of us interested in the developing constitution, human rights and judicial review, weary of re-reading hand-me-down copies of Dicey, this inattention is to be regretted. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:10 am
A bit of background on the laws that were relevant to the Court in the Carpenter case (because the Magic 8 Ball is predicting that as technology continues to be a critical aspect of our personal and business lives, there will continue to be legal activity on the issue of what is private vs. what is shared). [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:10 am
A bit of background on the laws that were relevant to the Court in the Carpenter case (because the Magic 8 Ball is predicting that as technology continues to be a critical aspect of our personal and business lives, there will continue to be legal activity on the issue of what is private vs. what is shared). [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 4:27 am
I interrupt our regularly scheduled programming—the continuing series on value storytelling—with a rant inspired by my pending Continuing Legal Education deadline. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 4:27 am
I interrupt our regularly scheduled programming—the continuing series on value storytelling—with a rant inspired by my pending Continuing Legal Education deadline. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:51 am
” “Vanderpump Rules is streaming on Peacock. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:12 am
Serv. 3d 422 (7th Cir. 2002) (“No class action is proper unless all litigants are governed by the same legal rules. [read post]
