Search for: "J. E. F." Results 2201 - 2220 of 6,243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm by Schachtman
Not surprisingly, many of Selikoff’s litigation- and regulatory-driven opinions have not fared well, such as the notions that asbestos causes gastrointestinal cancers and that all asbestos minerals have equal potential and strength to cause mesothelioma. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
In this case, the Board examined a Georgia criminal statute under the circumstance-specific approach to determine whether the statute was a crime of domestic violence pursuant to INA § 237(a)(2)(E)(i). [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
In this case, the Board examined a Georgia criminal statute under the circumstance-specific approach to determine whether the statute was a crime of domestic violence pursuant to INA § 237(a)(2)(E)(i). [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
CIKLIN, C.J., and GERBER, J., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.Source: http://www.4dca.org/opinions/July%202016/07-13-16/4D15-1778.op.pdfFighting for you or a friend. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:12 pm by Jim Gerl
Section 300.502;  prior written notice, sections 615(b)(3)-(4) and (c)(1); informed parental consent, Section 614 (a)(1)(D); access to educational records, Section 615(b)(1); state complaints, 34 CFR Section 300.151, et seq; mediation, Section 615(e); child’s placement during a challenge or “stay put,” Section 615 (j); procedures for an interim alternative education, Section 615 (k); unilateral placement in private school when FAPE in issue, Section… [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 10:16 am by José Manuel Gómez Porchini
Ya que leyeron mucho, es decir, unos cien libros por año, que son como ocho al mes o dos por semana, algo fácil, comienzan a redactar. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
Third, and also for the first time on appeal, M.H. contends that, as applied here, section 647(j)(1) violates his First Amendment rights.In re M.H., supra.In the opinion, the court explains, initially, that  [w]e affirm. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 10:16 am by A. Sasha Mandy
Une décision récente de la Cour fédérale nous éclaircit à cet égard. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
My student Elizabeth Arias and I — with the invaluable help of local counsel Michael F. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 10:49 pm
Sections 41A.5(c)-(j) permit civil and criminal actions against owners and housing platforms that violate the ordinance. [read post]