Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 2201 - 2220 of 13,964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2021, 7:10 am by John Jascob
The SEC’s newly appointed Enforcement Director, Gurbir Grewal, said that "[f]ull and honest disclosure remains the cornerstone of our securities laws – no matter what technologies are used to offer and sell those securities. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:41 pm by Russell Knight
“[T]he court shall assign each spouse’s non-marital property to that spouse. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 12:13 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See ChargePoint, 920 F.3d at 769 (“[T]he § 101 inquiry must focus on the language of the Asserted Claims themselves . . . . [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 3:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
Oregon Dep't of Agric. (2008) (stating that the government "could not generally prohibit or punish, in its capacity as sovereign, speech on the ground that it does not touch upon matters of public concern"); Connick v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 24 – Remedies: Thomas F. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:00 am by Colby Pastre
Profits of U.S. multinationals booked in their controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) could be included in the parent companies’ taxable income through two methods: passive CFC profits—such as interest and royalty income—were automatically included in their parent companies’ taxable income via subpart F rules, but active CFC profits were only subject to tax when repatriated to the parent as a dividend. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:45 am by Daniel
It doesn’t matter how the assets are titled. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:21 am by Daniel
”“School-related matters, including the address to be used for school-boundary determination and registration. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Where the acts were clearly lawful under applicable non-bankruptcy law, courts use a balancing test, but that didn’t matter here because the literally false and intentionally misleading advertising campaign was not “ordinary course commercial conduct,” but rather unlawful under nonbankruptcy law.Defendants unhelpfully argued that they subjectively didn’t believe they were violating the stay, which didn’t matter. [read post]