Search for: "Matter of Thomas J." Results 2201 - 2220 of 2,763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2011, 4:26 am by SHG
“It is plausible,” Judge Thomas M. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 7:00 am by Abigail Slater
 The second statement was in the dissent of FTC Commissioner J. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:36 am by Nabiha Syed
Seven Justices joined parts of Justice Thomas’ opinion for the Court. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:30 pm by Rick
Perhaps Thomas and the majority understood that the redefinition would be far too obvious. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 11:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93, 112–113 (2d Cir. 2010) (setting out elements for Lanham Act false advertising claim, which do not include a requirement that a party possess trademark rights); see also J. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:58 pm by Rick
Justices Roberts, Thomas and Alito?! [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:49 am by WSLL
Thomas Metier and Patrick J. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 6:48 am by The Legal Blog
In case the Court exercised the power which it was not having, it is a void ab initio matter. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by INFORRM
  Sharp J granted a privacy injunction to restrain the publication of a range of information which tended to identify the claimant and which related to the subject matter of the action. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:28 am by INFORRM
Such an approach would be consistent with the test applied by the Press Complaints Commission.[96] I am prepared to acknowledge that a court nowadays might not apply quite so strict a test to that laid down by Ungoed-Thomas J in Beloff v Pressdram [1973] 1 All ER 241, 260: “… the disclosure justified in the public interest, of matters carried out or contemplated, in breach of the country’s security, or in breach of law, including statutory duty, fraud or… [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:03 pm by WSLL
Thomas Sullins, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: Thomas A. [read post]