Search for: "Miller v. U.s" Results 2201 - 2220 of 2,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Many news analysts seem dubious, based on the fact that similar arguments were rejected by the U.S. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
" "Harmful to minors" is similar to the community-standards obscenity test that the Court formulated in Miller v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and related cases.[6]” The court in Ladd Furniture v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 “Obscenity” is one of a few categories of speech that may be regulated by states consistent with the First Amendment (see Penal Law § 235.00).[4]  The U.S. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 “Obscenity” is one of a few categories of speech that may be regulated by states consistent with the First Amendment (see Penal Law § 235.00).[4]  The U.S. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:45 am
Since 1973, however, the Court has adhered to a three-part test it set forth in Miller v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am by Rob Robinson
Archive Advances Records Management - http://bit.ly/qmA1kC (Evan Koblentz) U.S Cyber Commander Declares Cyber War! [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 2:38 pm by Dennis Crouch
Ct. 1530 (2015) and distinguished the issue-date focus of the classic Supreme Court case of Miller v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
thee with much cherishing, thou eight relisted Miller retroactivity cases, with records received, waiting to learn whether, after between five and six relists each, and many brethren remanded, their outcomes will be changed soon by Montgomery v. [read post]