Search for: "People v. Thomas" Results 2201 - 2220 of 5,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:30 am by Josh Blackman
"Constitutional rights are enshrined with the scope they were understood to have when the people adopted them. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 12:14 pm by Cindy Cohn and Karen Gullo
But making public something that people in a functioning democracy deserve to know should tak [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Accordingly, passage of the RFMA would be useful insurance in the event that the Court overrules Windsor and/or Obergefell--as Justice Thomas made clear he would like the Court to do in his concurrence in Dobbs v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:18 am by SHG
As Justice Thomas said in his dissent to the denial of cert in Silvester v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:54 am by SHG
The issue came to mind when reading this commentary by Ken at Popehat: Take Justice Thomas’ dissent. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:18 pm by Gene Quinn
Even the great Thomas Edison, the most prolific inventor in US history, rarely came up with pioneering inventions. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Supreme Court … The People of the State of New York, ex rel, William Kemmler against Charles F. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am by Benjamin Beaton
In 2011, Justice Thomas Lee of the Utah Supreme Court was the first to use corpus linguistics in a judicial opinion: In re the Adoption of Baby E.Z.* Since then, the Utah Supreme Court has continued to use corpus linguistics, and in 2016 majority and dissenting opinions from the Michigan Supreme Court both embraced corpus linguistics in People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am by Benjamin Beaton
In 2011, Justice Thomas Lee of the Utah Supreme Court was the first to use corpus linguistics in a judicial opinion: In re the Adoption of Baby E.Z.* Since then, the Utah Supreme Court has continued to use corpus linguistics, and in 2016 majority and dissenting opinions from the Michigan Supreme Court both embraced corpus linguistics in People v. [read post]