Search for: "SCALES v. STATE"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 4,627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2010, 2:20 am
For example, the Respondent in CHRISTIAN DIOR COUTURE v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm
Dukes and how it reshapes large-scale class actions. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 1:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 2:05 pm
State. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:15 am
In Hilborn v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:08 pm
The case involves a state probe of the state supreme court campaign of William M. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Nevertheless, containing a little over 71,000 words spread over 578 paragraphs and 161 pages - registering as a full 8.4 on the Arnold Scale - this is no lightweight. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:54 am
In OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22, the Grand Chamber handed down a preliminary ruling following a request by the Tribunal du Travail de Liège. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:11 am
Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:36 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> In Defense of Animals v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:12 am
Theodosakis v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:13 am
In Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook, the Court of Justice of the EU held that a court of a Member State can order platforms not only to take down defamatory content globally, but also to take down identical or “equivalent” material. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:15 am
I just don't think it's his preferred course of action.However, if the Democrats were to abolish the filibuster now and enact a law more or less codifying Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
The Commission had merely stated that the Safe Harbour scheme was acceptable under the principles set out by the Data Protection Directive, without analyzing whether the US data protection legislation as such offered the adequate level of protection to EU citizens. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 7:29 am
Issues for the Supreme Court In considering the appeal, the Supreme Court addressed the following issues: whether there had been an abuse of EU law by the claimants in relying on Article 4 of the Brussels Regulation Recast to establish jurisdiction over Vedanta as anchor defendant for the purpose of attracting the English courts’ jurisdiction over the claim against KCM, “the real targets of the claim”; whether the claimants’ pleaded case and supporting evidence disclosed no… [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 6:51 am
Pruitt's work seeks to revive legal consideration of spatial variations in provision of government services, a concern that waned following the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in San Antonio Independent Schools v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:30 am
The prevailing narrative has it that states rights were radically scaled back first by the Civil War, then Reconstruction and later the destruction of Jim Crow, all of which is true. [read post]
