Search for: "State v. Davis " Results 2201 - 2220 of 6,078
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2016, 7:03 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Law, 559 So. 2d 187, 188 (Fla. 1989)); see also Davis v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
Although not by any means a landmark case, this writer still found it interesting, and wonders where the case would've gone had the claimants argued their case differently (and admittedly, better, by the looks of the comments made by the judge).Source: Davies Collison Cave [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:01 am by Dominic Pugh
In order to ascertain whether the works constituted “works of repair”, it was necessary to compare the property in its actual state with its previous state (Quick v Taff Ely Borough Council [1985] EWCA Civ 1). [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 1:15 am by Dennis Crouch
[AppleResponse] The statute states that an adjudged infringer “shall be liable to the owner to the extent of his total profit. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 2:49 pm by Giles Peaker
Home Group Limited v Jacqueline Emery & anor, Edmonton County Court 08/08/16 (County Court decision unreported elsewhere). [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 6:27 am
Loseman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Saturday, July 30, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fraud-on-the-Market, Halliburton, Merger litigation,Omnicare v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:04 am by INFORRM
  Article 1(3) of that Directive limits the field of application of the directive to activities falling with the TFEU, thereby excluding matters covered by Titles V and VI of the TEU at that time (e.g. public security, defence, State security). [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 14 July 2016, Nicola Davies J ordered the hearing of a preliminary issue in the case of Baxmann v Etok. [read post]