Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 2201 - 2220 of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Judge Lauck of the Eastern District of Virginia recently handed down the long-awaited opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:44 am by Florian Mueller
It was the first pro-FRAND ruling by an Asian court that I've ever heard of. [read post]
Because this case began in the First Judicial District Court, Dakota County, Minnesota, the Eighth Circuit concluded that is where this case must return. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:54 am by Schachtman
”) (quoting Advisory Committee Note to 2000 Amendments to Rule 702); Citizens State Bank v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
” And because of the “ongoing chilling effect of the state law,” Roberts opined, the district court “should resolve this litigation and enter appropriate relief without delay. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 10:53 am by Edward Foley
The same judicial methodology is employable in Gill v. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am by Tobias Thienel
Occidental Exploration and Production Co., supra, at para. 49).When, similarly, the question was put to the House of Lords whether the possibility of judicial review was to be taken seriously where state secrets limited the court’s power of review, Lord Hutton noted that Article 6 (1) ECHR would require the court to adapt its procedure in order to be able to perform its function of judicial review; the presence of state secrets as such… [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm by MOTP
Concluding that the movants for arbitration had not substantially invoked the judicial process, the Court did not even reach the second prong of the Perry Homes v Cull test: prejudice to the party opposing arbitration. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This was the first abortion ruling since Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh joined the Court, but the right to abortion survived this first ruling more or less intact. [read post]
Finding a “lack of Article III standing required to confer federal jurisdiction,” the court remanded the case to the district court with directions to return it to the Missouri state court. [read post]