Search for: "State v. Hadding"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 124,542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2009, 5:03 am
On appeal, Vennus argued that the State had failed to prove that the officer had specific articulable facts that would provide reasonable suspicion to detain Vennus. [read post]
30 May 2014, 8:29 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
In a highly-publicized case, United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:42 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:00 am
The case had almost nothing to do with the legitimacy and enforceability of the local, state, and federal laws that protect animals. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 6:28 pm
In Arista v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:01 am
State v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 1:57 pm
Simply stated the mid-April complaint specified that the actions and non-action taken by the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:44 pm
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court finally issued its long-awaited ruling in Eaton v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 11:51 pm
One was Harris County, TX v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:19 am
Brooks stated that he has "no idea" whether the Supreme Court will take on Prince v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
The plaintiffs argued that Lagas v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 1:15 am
The First Department has issued their decision in Kremen v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:00 pm
The court had previously denied a similar petition for writ of certiorari taken from the California Supreme Court's decision in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
In Degelmann v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
The State appealed.In an earlier, and similar action, the Appellate Division, School Administrators Association of New York v New York State Department of Civil Service, 124 AD3d 1174, the State had argued that School Administrators' claims were barred by the four-month statute of limitations. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Schwab v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Schwab v. [read post]
