Search for: "State v. Stai" Results 2201 - 2220 of 16,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Jordan Bierkos
Having found no binding arbitration agreement, Evoqua’s application for a stay of the action in favour of arbitration was denied. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am by Cormac Early
United States, a challenge to the ban on direct corporate campaign spending in the Federal Campaign Finance Act, and McCutcheon v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 11:48 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
  He rightly concludes, I believe, that it is a constitutional right based upon the Supreme Court’s unanimous 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 2:35 pm
  So then, in 1999, the landlord had the tenant "update" the blank on the form to say one adult and one child.The tenant stays in the place for a decade. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:37 am by Dave
We have been aware of Coombes v LB Waltham Forest (Sec of State intervening) noted at [2010] All ER (D) 59 and on Lawtel, decided on 08.03.2010 in an extempore judgment (Cranston J), but waiting for the full transcript to be provided by the High Court. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:37 am by Dave
We have been aware of Coombes v LB Waltham Forest (Sec of State intervening) noted at [2010] All ER (D) 59 and on Lawtel, decided on 08.03.2010 in an extempore judgment (Cranston J), but waiting for the full transcript to be provided by the High Court. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:38 pm by Kent Scheidegger
See this post.The Government's motion to stay or vacate the injunction is here. [read post]
United States, three protestors stood up and spoke out against the court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In that proceeding Employee had alleged that the Village had breached the collective bargaining agreement by failing to provide him with disability retiree health insurance coverage.* "By commencing an action at law involving arbitrable issues" pursuant to Article 78 the Appellate Division opined that BPTC and Employee "had waived whatever right [they] had to arbitration," citing Hart v Tri-State Consumer, Inc., 18 AD3d 610. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In that proceeding Employee had alleged that the Village had breached the collective bargaining agreement by failing to provide him with disability retiree health insurance coverage.* "By commencing an action at law involving arbitrable issues" pursuant to Article 78 the Appellate Division opined that BPTC and Employee "had waived whatever right [they] had to arbitration," citing Hart v Tri-State Consumer, Inc., 18 AD3d 610. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 7:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The case should not have been stayed because the minor plaintiff is not trying to enjoin any state proceedings. [read post]