Search for: "State v. Whited"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 13,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2008, 1:59 pm
With only limited crossover voting by whites, District 18’s black voters have repeatedly nominated and elected a black state representative - in fact, in each election since 1992. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
We have two topics dominating today’s conversation on LXBN: the Supreme Court ruling in Christopher v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
Scott & White Mem'l Hosp. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:36 pm
(Basu v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 8:38 pm
Though Duke v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm
White et al. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:03 pm
The ruling in Farrakhan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Justices Kavanaugh and Kagan–who both worked in the White House–stated that it was fairly common for government officials to "berate" the press. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:40 am
"The case is Zervos v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 7:07 am
There's lots of coverage this morning on the Ricci v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Co. v White, 548 US 53, 68). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Co. v White, 548 US 53, 68). [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
See, e.g., Whiting v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Boyden Gray, Adam White, and Adam Gustafson. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:03 am
In United States v. [read post]
