Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 2201 - 2220 of 16,386
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2022, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Given recent history of the Church on this subject, there appears to be a strong public interest in this story. [read post]
Sheer exhaustion among legislators may also militate against further reform efforts in the next few years, even though a strong case can be made for addressing some changes that did not make the cut—such as bringing the UCMJ’s jury-voting provisions into sync with the unanimity rule the Supreme Court announced in Ramos v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:02 am by Abbe R. Gluck
” In this regard, it is interesting to note that the leading precedent the government relies on is United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 4:38 am by Peter J. Sluka
  And while they can be stated with disarming simplicity, rarely is their application quite as simple. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by admin
(rejecting per se inadmissibility of eyewitness expert witness opinion testimony). [9] State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 12:44 am by CMS
In this post, Jessica Eaton, an associate in the litigation team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in the Bloomberg LP v ZXC [2022] UKSC 5, case which concerned the right to privacy in the context of a criminal investigation. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The Solicitor’s office filed a strong responsive brief which makes me think that we’ll see a denial here. [read post]
” Key takeaways for employers This decision represents a strong statement in support of two of the principles that originally underpinned the worker’s compensation scheme more than a century ago. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:44 am by Florian Mueller
By contrast, in the United States the government firstly has to go to court and seek an injunction from an impartial judge. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 7:18 pm by Mark Walsh
The first case, Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am by David A. Martin
The central part of the 117-page opinion,  captioned Texas v. [read post]