Search for: "B. Smith" Results 2221 - 2240 of 5,330
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
  The Advisory Committee Notes explain that the various techniques of discovery kick in by virtue of Rule 26(b), where automatic disclosure and report requirements of Rule 26(a) leave off: “Rules 26(b)(4)(B) and (C) do not impede discovery about the opinions to be offered by the expert or the development, foundation, or basis of those opinions. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , then allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
Convatec counterclaimed that Smith & Nephew’s Durafiber product would infringe the patent. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog.A long time ago in a town not so far away, a teacher offered a piece of advice to his students:  A word to the wise is sufficient. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:26 am by Edward Smith
Smith has been practicing personal injury law for over 30 years. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 11:12 am by Edward Smith
In the mid-morning on Tuesday, a big rig driven by 63-year-old Christopher B. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Smith, 2015 SCC 34 [1] Regulations under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C. 1996, c. 19 (“CDSA”), permit the use of marihuana for treating medical conditions. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 10:23 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court then addressed Petitioners’ contention that the 17–story tower violated Section B.5 of the Green Hills UDO, which sets a 60–foot maximum building height at the “build-to line” of Hillsboro Pike. [read post]