Search for: "BAKER v BAKER" Results 2221 - 2240 of 4,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm by Lucy Reed
THE CASES In A Local Authority v DG and Others [2014] EWHC 63 (Fam), [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported at April [2014] Fam Law 433) (‘A LA v DG’) Keehan J dealt with case management issues arising within care proceedings where there were concurrent criminal proceedings, following the alleged murder of the mother by the father. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:45 am
I concluded that, as a practical matter, this procedural action in Peruta probably doesn’t mean much, because the same issue has been raised in Baker v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 5:50 am
"By the way, you might be wondering — this is where my mind goes, and I'm actually quite interested in the legal question in the case of Peggy Young v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s oral argument in Elonis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:40 am by David DePaolo
This morning's WorkCompCentral story about the recent California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board's Significant Panel Decision in Bodam v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"Citing Baker v Poughkeepsie City School District, 18 NY3d 714, the court said that “[a]lthough a particular individual's involvement or participation in the disciplinary process does not automatically compel his or her recusal, the case law makes clear that "individuals who are personally or extensively involved in the disciplinary process should disqualify themselves from reviewing the recommendations of a Hearing Officer and from acting on the charges. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
The Arkansas decision, by Obama-appointee Kristine Baker, came in Jernigan v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Jane noted that the DC Circuit denied a rehearing en banc in Allaithi v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It remains one of only three decisions in federal trial courts to uphold a ban, but the judges in the other two did not address the issue directly, finding that they had no authority to consider the issue because they were bound by a one-line Supreme Court decision in 1972 (Baker v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 3:56 pm by John Enser
He will discuss major disputes on which the Tribunal has adjudicated, including BPI v MCPS [Blogger's note - a superb judgement from Robin Jacob QC, as he then was] and Meltwater v NLA. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:22 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also declined to reverse the judgment due to either an alleged ex parte communication or improper jury instructions, reasoning that none of the alleged mistakes amounted to reversible error (Walgreen Co v Hinchy, November 14, 2014, Baker, J). [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The state used sixteen of the twenty-one pages in its application to argue that point, including assertions that both Baker v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:38 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Spaulding Panel III - The Future of Foreign Intelligence Moderator: Laura Donohue; Discussants: William Banks, Jameel Jaffer, David Kris and Robert Litt Panel IV - Ethical Issues Facing Lawyers Practicing National Security Law: A Discussion Discussants: Harvey Rishikof and the Honorable James Baker Panel V - The Economic & Financial Threat Domain: Making Smart Sanctions Smarter Moderator: John Norton Moore; Discussants: Ilan Berman, Richard Newcomb,… [read post]