Search for: "DOES 1-12" Results 2221 - 2240 of 28,904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The decision discusses alleged conflicting or at least diverging application of G 1/92, as well as G 1/92 itself, in detail. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 9:30 am
That presumes that Governor DeSantis does not issue a line item veto on the amounts recommended in the Budget bill. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:00 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
”  ‘Schoolsite’ does not include any postsecondary educational facility attended by secondary pupils or private kindergarten, elementary, or secondary school facilities. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 4:44 am by Florian Mueller
"For Fiscal Year 2 of the License Agreement [July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013], Samsung reported to Microsoft [...] that Samsung owed over $1 billion in royalties under the Agreement. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
Hopefully, it does not suffer enjoy the same fate as South Africa’s Copyright Amendment Bill which was returned to Parliament to address the President’s (South Africa) reservations. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:51 am by Kevin Kaufman
Connecticut’s estate tax will have a flat rate of 12 percent by 2023. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:09 am by azatty
How does bankruptcy affect my taxes? [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm by Jack Goldsmith
  As a technical matter the Resolution does not satisfy Section 8(a)(1) of the WPR, which provides: SEC. 8. [read post]
9 May 2021, 8:51 am
   That it does not work as law (but perhaps as an ideological statement certainly) has been expressed  (for a detailed deconstruction, see Bulletin of the Coalition for Peace & Ethics,Volume 14 No. 2 (Special Issue) Commentary on the U.N. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 6:39 am
Otherwise, trade marks to which Article 7(1)(i) EUTMR applies would obtain broader protection than under Article 7(1)(h) EUTMR (10/07/2013, T-3/12, Member of €e euro experts, EU:T:2013:364). [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 6:19 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
Without Code §682, Donor Spouses should remain taxable on those trusts under the grantor trust rules because Code §672(e)(1) continues to apply. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 41.37(c)(1)(2006), we also affirm the rejection of claims 9, 10, and 12, asthese claims were not argued separately.We affirm the rejection of claim 30 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]