Search for: "Doe LLC" Results 2221 - 2240 of 28,257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Erica Woodruff
The ARB explained that the protected activity does not need to describe an actual violation of the law and a SOX complaint does not have to relate to fraud against shareholders. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 9:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"link: http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/intellectual-ventures-i-llc-v-symantec-38901/It is worthwhile mentioning another case that involved the relation between the First Amendment and IP law: Golan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 10:54 pm by Richard Burt
Comment:  This paragraph is also a fair description, though it does not mention some exceptions to limited liability, such as “piercing the corporate veil” (also known as “alter ego” liablity), individual liability for wrongful acts, and personal guaranties. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:09 am by Legal Writer
appeared first on Petrelli Previtera Schimmel, LLC. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:24 am
Misuse is not an affirmative defense to a claim for strict products liability, but it does "negate a design defect claim. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:59 am
Technologies, LLC, in which the Court of Appeals ruled that a member of an LLC without majority control does not have a fiduciary duty to the other members of the LLC or to the LLC itself. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
But its opponent, Knowles Electronics LLC, sought to tamp down the significance of the ruling saying that the manufacturing process that it currently uses is not affected.Later, the post states:Still, Analog Devices said it is seeking damages for past sales of the microphones.but neglects to mention that the ITC does not award damages.The technology at issue is micro-electromechanical systems [MEMS]. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
UBS Securities, LLC , in which the Court overturned a 2nd Circuit decision and held that “Sarbanes-Oxley does not include a retaliatory intent element, and that such requirement would be inconsistent with the statute’s burden-shifting framework. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:18 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
South Bend, Indiana – Plaintiff Cook Productions, LLC of Los Angeles, California sued 11 unnamed “Doe” Defendants in the Northern District of Indiana for infringing the copyrighted motion picture “Mr. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 9:42 am by Narine Khngikyan
  The product’s label does not list soy, a recognized allergen, as an ingredient on the package label. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 2:14 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
  Hammond, Indiana – Modern Vascular LLC (“Modern Vascular”), the Plaintiff, originally filed suit against Defendants, Modern Vascular & Vein Center, Nazar Golewale and Jane Doe Golewale, in the U.S. [read post]