Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 5,670
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2014, 3:04 pm
Virginia v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
Thus, generally, cross motions do not "'obviate a plenary trial of disputed issues of fact, where such exists; nor do cross-motions constitute a waiver by the litigants to such a trial.'" [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm
Karuk Tribe of California v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Duncan v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:04 pm
Hauf v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 4:30 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Read the decision at: Antrim Truck Centre Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:47 am
The case, Jordan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:16 am
Cross posted at Shark and Shepherd. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 9:31 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:28 pm
Bell v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Asa result, the Court GRANTS the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment andDENIES the Government’s motion to dismiss and alternative cross-motion forsummary judgment.I. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
A: people who participate are over 18, relatively good cross-section of community. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:33 pm
You can get the text as it currently stands, but not without all kinds of cross-references and cross-cross-references. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Exempt From CEQA Review People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:40 pm
However, as the Supreme Court recently ruled (PDF) in Brown v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 1:45 pm
After 1875 the beneficiary would not even need to cross Westminster Hall to obtain an injunction from the Court of Chancery. [read post]
21 Aug 2021, 9:02 am
” Hall v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 7:34 am
The digital agenda also aims to improve digital identity systems to facilitate access to public services and promote cross-border digital services in a framework of regional integration. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:11 am
In Bearden v. [read post]
