Search for: "State v. David" Results 2221 - 2240 of 12,927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2012, 12:28 pm by WSLL
Reversed.Case Name: CONNIE MARIE POWELL v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Nov. 8, 2012), primarily concerning its fraudulent joinder holding – in accord with the “overwhelming weight of authority” in other states – that a hospital cannot be strictly liable for claimed defects in drugs and medical devices that are used in medical procedures within its walls. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:34 am by Amy Howe
   This morning at ten o’clock the Court will hear oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am by Dan Lopez
In this episode of Antitrust Matters, Matt Cantor, Ankur Kapoor, and David Golden analyze and react to the April 24, 2023, decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal in the Epic Games v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:07 am by INFORRM
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) was heard on 8 February 2012 and judgment was reserved. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
Iqbal and Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:34 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals affirms the verdict.The case is Mulholland v. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWHC 2818 (Admin) (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court, before Collins J), Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am by CMS
“Pay now, argue later” is ultimately the decision of the Supreme Court in Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:59 pm
The Supreme Court heard argument in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]