Search for: "State v. K. T."
Results 2221 - 2240
of 3,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2012, 6:26 pm
RICHARD T. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:07 am
t der Universita? [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
In a 21-page Memorandum Decision following a lengthy bench trial in Chiu v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:31 pm
Drug Compounding and Competition: The United States District Court for the District of Columbia, in K-V Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm
In a 21-page Memorandum Decision following a lengthy bench trial in Chiu v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
You Can’t Get There from HereWe’re somewhat less enamored with Romero v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
Vita-Mix loses an appeal to the CAFC:Vita-Mix Corporation (“Vita-Mix”) appeals from the district court’s final judgment in which the court con-cluded that Vita-Mix infringed the asserted claims of two United States patents, K-TEC, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:25 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia dealt a blow to K-V Pharmaceutical Company’s (“KV’s”) efforts to “restore” orphan drug exclusivity for the pre-term birth drug MAKENA (hydroxyprogesterone caproate) Injection, 250 mg/mL, by granting FDA’s Motion to Dismiss a case filed by KV back in early July. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:55 pm
NLRB’s Challenge To Arizona Constitution’s Secret Ballot Provision In NLRB v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:20 am
K-TEC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:38 am
DiFilippo checked with a Postal Inspector, the package was identified and checked by a K-9 trained in narcotics detection, who alerted on it. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
Bush v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 5:25 am
Soon, legal experts say, the trend swept through state and local law-enforcement agencies across America. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
But statistically, that doesn’t matter. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 9:02 am
For an example of this doctrine in practice – a patent being interpreted as though an error had been corrected – take a look at Decision T 1795/07, or save yourself the hard work and read the summary on the ever-informative K’s Law blog. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:15 am
The case of State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:15 am
The case of State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm
If it had been intended to exclude disrepairs caused by the tenant, the covenant would or should have stated this in terms. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm
If it had been intended to exclude disrepairs caused by the tenant, the covenant would or should have stated this in terms. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:15 am
The case is United State v. [read post]
