Search for: "State v. L. B. T."
Results 2221 - 2240
of 3,630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm
Ct. 792, 9 L. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:10 am
Daniel L. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:38 am
T. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
Box b. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:27 am
So the court stated in Zomba Enters. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:04 pm
Midland Nat’l Life Ins. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:04 pm
Midland Nat’l Life Ins. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 8:25 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 5:36 am
Climate change litigation in the United States (Farber) L. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
” Earp v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:12 pm
See, e.g., Dep't. of Transp. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:34 pm
Professor Loewy’s article, United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
T. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm
§ 3731(b)(2) in a suit in which the United States has declined to intervene and, if so, whether the relator constitutes an “official of the United States” for purposes of Section 3731(b)(2). [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:52 am
Inc. v. [read post]
