Search for: "State v. Maker" Results 2221 - 2240 of 4,683
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2015, 8:59 am by Michael Risch
But perhaps no section is more ignored by courts than Section 90(2) - which states that a charitable subscription (a donation) is binding without reliance. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
With reference to China’s ongoing reform, the conference brought together academics, professionals, members of the judiciary, policy makers, and the like, with their collective knowledge and expertise to engage open communication with the themes of “making, enforcing and accessing the law”. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am by Amy Howe
As I noted in my preview of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm by Benjamin Wittes
A federal judge ordered his release in March 2010, but the United States government has fought that order. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 11:03 pm by Florian Mueller
Also, a document I discovered about a year ago explains why Ericsson prefers to sue device makers rather than do license deals with chipset makers like Qualcomm.Apple v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 5:33 pm by John Tomaszewski
In essence, the definition of “personal information” and the “harm” v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The US Supreme Court rejected such an argument in Arkansas Educational Television Commission v Forbes (1998). [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:03 am by David DePaolo
State of Florida.In the meantime, the Florida Supreme Court has another, similar, matter pending before it called Hector v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The question of whether Canadian lawyers ought to be trusted to govern themselves has been repeatedly raised by the public, policy-makers and the academy over the past several decades. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:08 am by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
Although opponents of disparate impact focus on Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
The case was brought by Pom Wonderful, the largest maker in the United States of 100% pomegranate juice and the owner of the 'POM' trade mark, which filed suit for infringement and requested that the defendant to be preliminarily enjoined from selling a pomegranate-flavoured energy drink labelled "pŏm".* Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financingIf your resolution for the New Year is to learn something more about biotech… [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
In Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA, [2014] EUECJ C-98/13 (06 February 2014), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that a pirated good is distributed in a member State when it is purchased online from a non-member State and shipped from another non-member State into a member State. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
First a word about the plaintiff: Some Kat readers may recall that Pom Wonderful prevailed in a closely watched decision given by the United States Supreme Court on June 12, 2014, Pom Wonderful LLC v Coca Cola Company. [read post]