Search for: "State v. R. E. J"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 2,733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2010, 5:29 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 360 (1967) (Harlan, J., concurring)). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Chief District Judge Robert J. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am
Thanks to the virtual telegraph, I’ve had the transcript in R (Coombes) v Secretary of State for CLG and Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 (Admin) for a few days (but it still does not appear on Baili, although, I gather, is available on Westlaw and the like), but a variety of circumstances (man flu/an excellent conference/family holiday culminating in a dramatic late night trip to a&e with my eldest, who’s absolutely fine, thanks) have prevented… [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 4:32 pm
See State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 4:49 am
Stone, John R. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
R. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:27 pm
Inability to demonstrate the possession of a required license permits the summary termination of an incumbentMatter of Cravatta v New York State Dept. of Transp., 23 Misc 3d 1137(A)In this case the court considered the application of the so-called "Felix" procedure [Felix v New York City Dep't of Citywide Administrative Services, 3 NY3d 498] in a situation where the incumbent loses or fails to renew a license required to perform the duties of the position or… [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:34 pm
”[22] This will results in higher state deficits and lower reimbursement rates. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer) US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer) US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Molina v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Appointed by President Gerald R. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:00 am
Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
(Docket Report) (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Defendant may not present jury argument concerning KSR’s change to obviousness standard: Datatreasurycorp v Wells Fargo & Co et al (Docket Report) District Court E Texas: Entire operating system cannot serve as royalty base where only the workspace switching feature is accused of infringement: IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
(Docket Report) (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Defendant may not present jury argument concerning KSR’s change to obviousness standard: Datatreasurycorp v Wells Fargo & Co et al (Docket Report) District Court E Texas: Entire operating system cannot serve as royalty base where only the workspace switching feature is accused of infringement: IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:49 pm
Comm’r, 15 T.C. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 9:50 am
Perry, Judge.Representing Appellant Braunstein: Paul J. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:27 am
Day and Mark R. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
Shweder ; editors Thomas R. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:55 am
Feb. 19, 2009). http://kuex.us/82ed State v. [read post]
