Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 8,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2019, 10:37 am
Quail Hill Community Association et al. (2018) shines some light on the oft-misunderstood California Anti-SLAPP statute and its effectiveness as a defense for actions by a homeowners association’s board of directors. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 9:52 am
Trump, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:35 am
Martin, et al. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:14 am
Facts: This case (Gjini v United States of America et al – United States District Court – Southern District of New York – February 8th, 2019) involves a claim of medical malpractice or negligence, and failure to protect pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 9:43 am
UPMC HEALTH NETWORK, INC. et al – United States District Court – Western District of Pennsylvania – February 7th, 2019) involves a claim alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 12:08 pm
Campie, et al. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
APM Terminals Tacoma, LLC, et al., No. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 7:26 am
The Office of United States Corporations, to be created by the bill, may revoke a corporation’s federal charter for noncompliance. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:26 am
There is every indication that the San Diego Apple et al. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 2:04 pm
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation et al., clarifying what makes someone “aggrieved” and able to bring a claim under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”). [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
Owners Insurance Company et al – United States District Court – Southern District of Georgia – Februrary 4th, 2019) involves an insurance claim which resulted from a damaged roof. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 6:03 am
On Jan. 28 and 29, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 7:36 am
Saint Louis City et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Missouri – February 1st, 2019) involves a claim under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 1:58 pm
The only justification offered by the trade group is “secondhand cannabis smoke has been shown to contain many of the same chemicals and carcinogens as secondhand tobacco smoke” citing to a single, more than 10 year old study, “A Comparison of Mainstream and Sidestream Marijuana and Tobacco Cigarette Smoke Produced under Two Machine Smoking Conditions” by Moir, et al., that admits, “There have been only limited examinations of marijuana smoke,… [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
The “state of the art” with respect to knowledge of silica and its alleged carcinogenicity was very different from the asbestos history. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:12 am
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation)Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 1:06 pm
Ware et. al., No. 1:11-cv-135, 2013 WL 6632436, at *1 (S.D. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:03 am
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. et al. v. [read post]
