Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price" Results 2221 - 2240 of 4,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2008, 10:20 pm
v=udEcTpLFIkk This week's episode also marks the beginning of a new segment that tackles Will Challenge Litigation step-by-step. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:04 am by Chris Carey
Many of the people who bought shares through the firms lost all, or nearly all, of their investments. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am by John Elwood
Illinois, antitrust damages claims may be brought by indirect purchasers who do not allege that they paid a price fixed by the alleged conspirators. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:49 pm
Two classes of people could bring such claims -- (1) a businss that lost customers or sales as a result of the antitrust violation and (2) the violator's customers, who overpaid because the violation hindered competition on price, quality, or other features. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 7:35 am by Amy Howe
Today the justices granted the funeral home’s petition for review, agreeing to consider whether Title VII bars discrimination against transgender people based on either their status as transgender or sex stereotyping under the Supreme Court’s 1989 decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm by Mohammad Fadel
  We thank God that all of us have paid the price together, so that none of us will easily give up his freedom in the future. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 2:38 am by Lana Ulrich
In May 2017, We the People podcast featured Cristina Rodriguez and Elizabeth Price Foley to discuss the sanctuary cities debate. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:35 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Justices seemed far more interested in the jury issue than in the other high-profile question before them in Skilling v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Launch of Westlaw UK Insight, online encyclopaedia of law Professor Stewart Purvis’ round up of the Newsnight sagas NUJ: Claudia Jones Memorial Lecture: Newcastle 2012 [video] In the Courts On 11 December 2012 judgment was handed down in the privacy case Price v Powell & Ors [2012] EWHC 3527 (QB). [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
They confirm how “socioeconomic status impacts judicial outcomes and how low- to middle-income people are priced out of the fairness touted by our system. [read post]