Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 2221 - 2240 of 4,280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2013, 1:09 pm by Mary Minow
What role should the United States government play in international initiatives at WIPO or elsewhere? [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 11:56 am by Wells Bennett
We’re a long ways way off from a trial in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:16 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  New Grounds of Inadmissibility – E-Verify and Mandatory Health Insurance In order to use the DC visa, visa holders (other than members of Congress) would be registered with E-Verify[iii] and thereby prove their eligibility to work in the United States as a prerequisite to obtaining the DC visa. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  First, as the current holder of an active Top Secret security clearance I am enjoined not to access classified materials that have been illegally disclosed. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
The Wiki points to a hagiographic obituary that quotes an anonymous friend who called Schepers “the Old War Horse, the record holder for longevity in the struggle against corporate crime. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am by Mary Dwyer
Sims 12-1217Issue: (1) Whether the “hot pursuit” doctrine articulated in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am by Amy Howe
Holder, in which the Court struck down the provision of the Voting Rights Act used to determine which state and local governments must comply with the Act’s preapproval requirement. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm by David Markus
After all, as a circuit judge wrote in 2009, “[t]he Judicial Conference of the United States for almost 20 years, and the Sentencing Commission for almost 10 years, have pleaded with the judiciary committees of Congress to do something about the serious injustices that these long, mandatory minimum sentences impose – to no avail. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:48 am by Laura C. Nagi
Aug. 26, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit reaffirmed its prior decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am by Dennis Crouch
The focus of the case is location – and, what is meant by an "offer to sell . . . within the United States" under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Our Constitution calls for an ongoing and perpetual government unless modified under the amendment process set forth in Article V of the Constitution or by revolution. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:40 pm by Florian Mueller
Holderman in Chicago (Northern District of Illinois) has largely adopted Judge Robart's approach, and in at least one respect -- the royalty base -- he actually took a licensee-friendlier approach, focusing completely on the price of WiFi chipsets because the patent holder failed to convince him of a royalty based on the price of an entire end product.The numerical outcome is that Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, a patent assertion entity that "has sued numerous coffee shops, hotels,… [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 8:58 am by Gene Quinn
On September 26, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a panel decision in Sunovion Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]