Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 51,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2007, 4:55 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 6:33 am
In Capitol v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 6:40 am
In Elektra v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
DoD Press Release, here, announces: The Department of Defense announced today that the convening authority, Office of Military Commissions, referred charges to a military commission in the case of “United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 12:54 pm
" Two cases, "Colorado v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 4:31 pm
At the time of defendant's trial, polygraph tests had not been proven to be reliable as held in People v Leone. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:09 am
In Toshiba Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 8:45 am
Sanchez v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm
Predicting the Fallout from King v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 12:16 pm
” Hart v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 5:56 pm
SUPREME COURT DENIES REVIEW IN CITY OF BOISE V. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:13 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358,… [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 1:04 am
The Illinois Supreme Court’s single-paragraph opinion in Keating v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
In a 4-3 decision covering a pair of cases, People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 11:48 am
Perhaps a combination of the above.Regardless, today sees yet yet another case from the CNMI that involves an incredibly lengthy (nearly 20 years) sentence for sex trafficking in the CNMI.You'd think that people would get the message by now, right? [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 1:51 pm
But I can summarize the one point on which they all agree in a single sentence:"Are we seriously appointing lawyers to defend people in death penalty cases who passed the bar four months ago?! [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 9:05 am
The justices will hear oral arguments on Dec. 4 in one of the highest-profile cases of the term so far, United States v. [read post]
