Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 48,916
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
In MacDonald v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:30 am
Among other concerns, the Proposed Standards (i) place an unworkable responsibility upon accountants to make subjective assessments of often complex and uncertain legal matters, the probability of future events, and the potential impact of those events, all of which are outside the scope of auditors’ typical responsibilities, (ii) endanger the confidentiality and protections of client communications that are foundational components of the lawyer-client relationship and our legal system and… [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:00 am
The webcast cost for non-members is $595. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
Koch & Kruger Brokers CC and Another v Financial Sector Conduct Authority and Others (CCT 229/22) [2023] ZACC 27 (15 August 2023) [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:17 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 11:20 am
Radcliffe Investment Properties Ltd v Meeson & Ors (LANDLORD AND TENANT – SERVICE CHARGES) (2023) UKUT 209 (LC) This is a very interesting appeal to the Upper Tribunal on the issue of a freeholder recovering waking watch costs through the leaseholder’s service charge. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
The El Paso Court of Appeals, in the recent case of Cactus Water Services LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:15 am
In Tippett v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:11 am
” “High Court Rules That City Law Firm Breached Duties By Acting For Client Despite Conflict Of Interest And By Failing To Provide Adequate Costs Information Under CFA: Forster V Reynolds Porter Chamberlain [2023] EWHC 1150 (Ch)” — “In its recent decision in Forster v Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP, the High Court found that City law firm, RPC, had breached its duty of care to its client, Ms Forster, after failing to keep her adequately… [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:28 pm
Tenth Circuit Decision: PCMA v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 1:01 pm
The plaintiffs in Homaidan v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:27 am
The importance of proving both liability and damages was illustrated in a recent Texas case, Danae Ruth McGann v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:39 am
In Armata v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:53 am
"] From U.S. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
& Appliance v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:42 am
Informants are cost-effective because they involve little expense. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:16 am
It is not unthinkable the prospect of further litigation and associated costs at the UPC influenced the decision – although this remains speculation. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 7:44 am
Dist. v. [read post]
