Search for: "DOES 2-25"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 16,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm
There is no need for the Court to wade into the labyrinth of1 The NCSLTs include the National Collegiate Master Student Loan Trust, NCSLT 2003-1, NCSLT 2004-1, NCSLT 2004-2, NCSLT 2005-1, NCSLT 2005-2, NCSLT 2005-3, NCSLT 2006-1, NCSLT 2006-2, NCSLT 2006-3, NCSLT 2006-4, NCSLT 2007-1, NCSLT 2007-2, NCSLT 2007-3, and NCSLT 2007-4.Case 1:17-cv-01323-GMS Document 54 Filed 11/01/17 Page 2 of 33 PageID #: 5803trust-related agreements to determine whether to… [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Importantly Access Copyright does not itself hold any of the copyrights that it manages. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
In a separate appeal, we affirmed the PTO’s invalidity determination, and the PTO cancelled claim 26. ePlus, Inc. at *2. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 4:55 pm
Seven exceptions, set forth in CPL 40.20(2), qualify the general proscription. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm
Shasta does not sell blood glucose meters, but competes with LifeScan in the market for test strips. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:46 pm
To hold that a party that behaves as the transferee court directs, or that follows the transferee court’s standing procedures, does so only by forfeiture of the proportionality provision of Rule 26(b)(2)(C), seems an uncongenial exercise of whatever discretion I have. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm
§ 465 (now 25 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:20 am
”BackgroundIn 2010 Louboutin obtained the registration of a Benelux trade mark for goods in Class 25. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:11 am
" [para 25]Moving on: notion of 'communication to the public'As usual, the CJEU began its analysis with a general discussion of the nature [preventative] of the communication to the public right [para 28]. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:48 am
Article 67(2) of the Rotterdam Rules 2009). [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
In the decision under appeal it was held that it does, because the subject-matter of claim 1 cannot claim priority from the US application No. 835,799 […]. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
The appellant requested that the decision of the opposition division not to admit document D18 into the proceedings be overturned.1.1 This request is subject to the Board's discretionary power to hold inadmissible facts, evidence and requests which could have been presented or were not admitted in the first instance proceedings (Article 12(4) RPBA 2007, which applies in view of Article 25(2) RPBA 2020). [read post]
9 May 2023, 8:13 am
Contrary to its reading proposed by the applicants, the Polish Supreme Court does not claim that the scope of application of the rule of direct jurisdiction provided for in Article 1103[7](2) PL CPP is, de lege lata, circumscribed and does not cover the liability of a foreign State for international crimes. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 2:17 pm
It’s a fair question as to why Teksavvy won’t oppose the Voltage motion for disclosure en masse of the names and addresses of 1 or 2 thousand of their customers. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
” ’401 patent, col. 2, lines 25-27 (as corrected by certificate of correction). [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 10:14 am
§ 112 ¶ 2 de novo, although, as with claimconstruction, any factual findings by the district courtbased on extrinsic evidence are reviewed for clear error.Cox Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 8:58 am
Whatever the reason, the Masonite Court does not answer the question. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 11:07 am
The proposed rule does not apply to noncompete provisions imposed upon 25% owners of a business in transaction documents related to the sale of the business. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm
The proposed rule does not apply to noncompete provisions imposed upon 25% owners of a business in transaction documents related to the sale of the business. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 2:07 pm
The proposed rule does not apply to noncompete provisions imposed upon 25% owners of a business in transaction documents related to the sale of the business. [read post]
