Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2018, 5:05 pm
New SCOTUS nominee, Judge Kavanaugh, addressed this issue in a concurring opinion in Ayissi-Etoh v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 8:38 am
The case is US v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
” Yeah, I like my plain English better too. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
” Yeah, I like my plain English better too. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 8:08 pm
In Hunter et al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
In a recent government memo, noted by Michael Geist, the spending power of online-streaming platform Netflix has been revealed with suggestions that the media outlet outspends Canada’s own private broadcasters on the production of Canadian-facing English scripted programming. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
The opinion in The United States of America v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 12:59 am
Interestingly, with regard to this last issue, the Constitutional Court refers to the CJEU decision C-146/13 Spain v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 2:23 am
it cannot make sense for the courts of another member state to give effect to a “reorganisation measure” but not to other provisions of the law of the home state affecting its operation. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 3:48 pm
The English version states that the denial of the right to bring a PAGA action is severable if such denial is found by a court to be unenforceable. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am
In 1998, the Supreme Court issued its most important modern decision on the Excessive Fines Clause, United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:39 am
French, Professor of Practice at Penn State Law, has published “English Justice for an American Company? [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 2:01 pm
We explain that the ’358 patent is plainly invalid under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
It will overrule Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court being held in a 7-2 decision (Justice Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts dissenting),Oil States Energy Servs. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The judgment merely states thatcat conceptually confused “it is sufficient to recall that, according to settled case-law, the repute of a trade mark is relevant, in assessing the likelihood of confusion, only as regards the repute of the earlier mark”, citing Gitana v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA), T‑569/11 (2013) (para 98). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
To review the Court’s opinion, see Trump v. [read post]
