Search for: "Howard v. State"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 2,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
Anthony Kennedy’s term would have ended in 2011 rather than 2018, before he wrote opinions such as United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 12:57 am
In Sutcliffe v Secretary of State for Education [2024] EWHC 1878 (Admin), Pepperall J commenced his judgment as follows: “[1]. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
” United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:59 pm
See also: Howard D. [read post]
24 May 2023, 2:44 pm
App. 2015) (recognizing that "the mere display of a gun is not deadly force as a matter of law"); see also Howard v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 4:21 pm
On Monday, June 28, 2010, in McDonald v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:37 am
During his stint at the Department of Justice, Sanford also participated in the only criminal trial ever held by the Supreme Court: United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
But experts say it is the president’s son-in-law, Howard Krein, who could present fresh ethical challenges for the new administration. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 6:35 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:00 am
End Notes: [1] Howard E. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:26 am
After Brown v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm
For example, in discussing Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 7:02 pm
But then along comes V-P Joe Biden on Meet the Press last Sunday:MR. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 10:47 am
In Fasolas v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:45 pm
The case is Save Lafayette Trees v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 10:49 am
If it seems odd that there will (hopefully) soon be a case captioned Violent J and Shaggy 2 Dope, et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 12:17 am
[With thanks to Howard Friedland.] [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
The decisions of Judge Colin Birss QC in the Patents County Court earlier this year in Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Knight (noted by the IPKat here and here) made fascinating reading. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:29 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the Court’s recent decision in Krupski v. [read post]
