Search for: "JUDICIAL BRANCH "
Results 2241 - 2260
of 8,496
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
" & why judicial review matters Throughout the memo, Barron conditions important legal conclusions on "the facts represented to" the OLC by other departments of the executive branch. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
Notably, other healthy and robust democracies do not allow courts to play an exclusive role in constitutional interpretation but promote dialogues among the branches in which legislatures or chief executives respond to judicial interpretations by offering their own competing interpretations. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 10:30 am
OLC also suggests that a case-by-case outlet is important to guard against the executive branch trumping statutory policy, however the basis for this connection isn’t obvious to me. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:16 pm
The government has itself declassified numerous relevant documents, including legal analyses and judicial interpretations. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 2:24 pm
We were fortunate this year to present several major public events while continuing our ongoing service to Congress, the Executive Branch, and the federal judiciary. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
Essentially, there is an interpretative act to be undertaken by the executive branch of government. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 8:33 am
“The practice of sweeping nationwide injunctions, broad restraining orders, and judicial policymaking must end,” he said. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 6:51 am
The abandonment of judicial deference to regulatory agency expertise, and the heightened expectation that Congress provide explicit statutory mandates, will create a backlog even a Republican managed legislature cannot avoid. 7) The Executive Branch will embrace artificial intelligence in creepy ways. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
”The Executive Order is set out below:Executive Order 8-149, EXPEDITING THE FOIL PROCESSWHEREAS, we seek to further transparency and openness in New York State government; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) is, and has always been, to foster an open and transparent government that all New Yorkers can hold proud; and WHEREAS, I received two bills pertaining to FOIL from the Legislature; andWHEREAS, while their goals were well-intended, these bills are seriously… [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 1:25 pm
With control of legislative branch, the executive branch, and a stacked judicial branch, they could do whatever they wanted for as long as they wanted to do it (or as long as they can get the American people to believe the lie that 'we the people' are in control).It sounds crazy but have you been listening to some of these politicians lately? [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 6:51 am
The abandonment of judicial deference to regulatory agency expertise, and the heightened expectation that Congress provide explicit statutory mandates, will create a backlog even a Republican managed legislature cannot avoid. 7) The Executive Branch will embrace artificial intelligence in creepy ways. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 8:34 am
The point of the above graphs is not to say this branch of government of that branch of government is covered most, but instead track trends in relative coverage over time. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 8:34 am
The judge or judicial branch could not modify alimony payments, but it could terminate them. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 5:54 am
He pointed out that the judicial branch can be reluctant to intervene in political disputes between the executive and legislative branches. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:01 am
L’88, Chancellor of the Delaware Court of Chancery, addressed students, faculty, and jurists in Penn Law’s Levy Conference Center to take on the issue of judicial restraint versus judicial activism. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
The Judicial Branch may hold hearings; it may even issue vague and unenforceable exhortations to diplomacy. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
As with all long-term relationships, the relationship between the branches cannot plausibly be based on conflict. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:49 pm
As we have seen, Raab claims that the Bill of Rights “helped mould a separation of powers between government, Parliament and the courts – a system of checks and balances to prevent any one branch of the state from dominating the others or abusing its power”. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:28 pm
“When the government claims that they alone control the determination of ‘need to know’ in judicial proceedings, they’re intruding on judicial power,” says California attorney Jon Eisenberg, who has no connection to the case but is following it closely because it involves a similar situation he faced in a different case. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:52 am
” The pilot is getting strong support; the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules has encouraged judges to join the pilot. [read post]
