Search for: "No Named Defendant" Results 2241 - 2260 of 57,339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” And there were three phone calls to plaintiff from people who’d seen or heard defendant’s ads, and one of defendant’s customers sent a letter to plaintiff complaining about defendant. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 5:51 am by Harold Hongju Koh
These deployments must retain kinetic capacity for “unit self-defense” to defend against imminent attacks. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
When one reads the indictment of the 19 defendants, it is surprising that all of the other 20 were dropped. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
It’s not like Nina Totenberg’s name was on the cover of a Supreme Court brief at the time she interviewed some justices. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 11:00 pm
"When the plaintiff in that case later filed a new lawsuit, he alleged that Bradley Corporate Park was a “fictitious” name and that the parties named in the new case were the ones that were “vicariously liable” for the injuries he sustained.When those defendants moved [pursuant to 3211(a)] to dismiss the case, based on the release, the Rockland County Supreme Court granted that relief. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Axios: “An Atlanta judge on Friday released the full special grand jury report into former President Trump and his 18 co-defendants’ alleged efforts to subvert 2020 election results in Georgia. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
Adding more ambiguity, it emerged that the Instagram accounts repeatedly changed names over time and some of these changes did not accord with the Claimants’ evidence. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm by Ilya Somin
If Musk wants to bar my account from his site because he doesn't like my views, or even just because he doesn't like people whose last names start with the letter "S," he should be free to do so. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 8:27 am by Hanlon Law, PA
Namely, he made 22 cash deposits under $10,000 over seven days and followed a similar pattern with 38 cash deposits, some on consecutive days, over approximately seven and a half months. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:49 am by Eric Goldman
The judge recounts some errors in this case: The complaint lists the plaintiff as “Xped LLC,” but its actual name is “Expeditee LLC. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 5:53 am by INFORRM
The central issue revolved around the use of sportspersons’ names and images to create Digital Player Cards and whether this constituted a violation of the plaintiff’s right to publicity or fell within the defendants’ freedom of expression. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 12:37 pm by Kalvis Golde
The government argued that, under the second clause, Miller had “obstruct[ed]” an “official proceeding” – namely, Congress’ session to certify the results of the 2020 election. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 11:58 am by Kevin
” Again the defendant’s name is printed in ALL CAPS, a practice about which I recently complained (see “‘ChiefsAholic’ Indicted for Robbing Banks to Fund ChiefAholism” (Aug. 18, 2023)) and yet continues to occur. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 11:53 am by The Law Office of James K. Meehan
The court also distinguished between the staffing agency as the “general employer” and the defendant as the “special employer” and pointed out the existence of an “alternate employer endorsement,” specifically naming the defendant in the staffing agency’s workers’ compensation. [read post]
If Trump’s motion for removal is anything like Meadows’, he will likely suggest that the actions contained in Willis’ indictment were undertaken as a part of his official duties as a federal officer—namely, the president of the US. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 7:17 am by Phil Dixon
WRAL also reports on a brewing dispute over ownership of a cat named “Bob” or “Maui,” depending on who you ask. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 7:00 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
The person, people, or entities you name in your lawsuit may be responsible for paying your damages. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 6:11 am by David Klein
Although not in the consumables space, the Court found that Blizzard Entertainment’s use of the BLIZZARD name was not inconsequential. [read post]