Search for: "State v. Bridges"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 2,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2016, 1:47 am
Ventures, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
The division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 differed from the device of I2 […] in that it included the (additional and final) feature dealing with the relationship between the light output L and the signal level V. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:36 pm
(Applause.)Let me ask you: Are you ready to elect Kamala Harris and Tim Walz president and vice president of the United States? [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Instead, most states authorize the attorney general of the state to oversee and enforce charitable trusts. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
In the course of this work I encountered Section 1905 in the following way.There was, and still is, a federal law on the books enacted in 2007 called the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act that mandates that important information from the majority of significant clinical trials run in the United States be published on the National Institute of Health (NIH) website. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
But in a series of decisions, culminating in Kelly v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:28 am
United States (SCOTUS) EFF CFAA Revisions – Penalties and Access (EFF) Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and Reform (EFF) Electoral Security: Election Security (EFF) Transcript Tarah: So in 2010, I was getting married for the first time. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
” See West River Bridge v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:52 am
Opportunity Scholarship Program went down in flames, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan stood on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:25 pm
Two days later, he spoke at a panel discussion for the Brooklyn Bar Association, where he defended the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 2:53 pm
Romania will become 18th member state in September. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:43 pm
The case illustrated the length to which the state will sometimes litigate to prevent embarrassing information being made public. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:00 am
As to the second, adequate information, the Judicial Counsel has presented parties with a golden opportunity to bridge the information gap: Construction Form Interrogatories. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:59 am
Case comment by Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel QC and Justin Levinson (Barristers for the Claimant, MAGA) MAGA v The Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church [2010] EWCA Civ 256, Court of Appeal (Lord Neuberger MR, Lord Justice Longmore and Lady Justice Smith) (read judgment) This appeal was brought with permission from the trial Judge Mr Justice Jack. [read post]
