Search for: "State v. Scales"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 4,700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Two court cases, Flagg v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:59 am
V. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 7:09 am
The new case on that question is Trevino v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:29 pm
Citation: U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 10:21 pm
Comments On the disrepair claim, this is another data point suggesting that the Courts are open to arguments for damages based on percentage of rent following English Churches v Shine and Earle v Charalambous, rather than the Wallace scale, as I have suggested before. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 2:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 2:15 pm
Koenderman in People v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:54 am
In OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22, the Grand Chamber handed down a preliminary ruling following a request by the Tribunal du Travail de Liège. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 4:10 am
blank">U.S. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:00 pm
As a comment to that post, Kathleen Walling, apparently a party in the Court of Appeals Walling v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 11:01 am
Economists Nicole V. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:32 am
Beer, et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:30 pm
– Dallas lawyer Cleve Clinton of Gray Reed & McGraw on the firm’s blog, Tilting The Scale Should Drivers Get One Free Swerve? [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:30 pm
– Dallas lawyer Jamie Ribman of Looper Reed & McGraw on the firm’s blog, Tilting the Scales Email Killing You? [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:00 am
That IA is engaged in precisely this activity at scale is normally described as enterprise piracy, not library lending. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 1:57 pm
The petition states “nothing in the FLSA’s text or purpose justifies interpreting the ‘administrative’ exemption with a heavy thumb on the scale against the employer. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:05 am
In a landmark case on joint custody, Beck v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:46 am
He said (at paragraph 102) that even when the loss to the children of their newly gained relationship with their father and other members of his family was weighed in the scales, "the balance still comes down heavily in favour of relocation".The President then found that conclusion supported by an application of the Payne v Payne exercise (paragraphs 111 to 118).Accordingly, he allowed the appeal. [read post]
