Search for: "Stephens v State" Results 2241 - 2260 of 6,349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Wayfair: Court approves state sales tax collection from out-of-state vendors [Caron/TaxProf first and second link roundup, Trevor Burrus and Matthew Larosiere, earlier] Ohio v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Stephen Bergstein of Bergstein and Ullrich in New Paltz represented Kirby in the appeal, according to the First Department opinion. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/823979.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am by Victoria Kwan
The next day, he discussed the Constitution and Brown v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:08 am by Stephen Bilkis
At Stephen Bilkis & Associates, we offer excellent legal services to assist you with your legal dilemmas. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm by Courtney Minick
Data generally cannot be copyrighted in the United States. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm by Courtney Minick
Data generally cannot be copyrighted in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:33 am by Aaron Pelley
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/836779.no2.pdf State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:54 pm by Stephen Page
That application prefaces the main application for the return of the child" Stephen Page, Harrington Family Lawyers, Brisbane spage@harringtonfamilylawyers.com 61(7) 3221 9544 [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
Stephens, the Court held that a prisoner who sought federal habeas relief based on three theories and prevailed in the district court on two of them does not have to file a cross-appeal or seek a certificate of appealability on the third theory to rely on it as part of his defense against the state’s appeal. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 1:00 am by Michael Scutt
As the recent (unreported) case of Stephens v Halfords PLC has shown, merely having a policy is not a magic panacea in itself. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 12:10 am by INFORRM
Yesterday’s decision in MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04) has become the most discussed media law case of the year so far. [read post]