Search for: "U.S. v. Merit*"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 10,879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2011, 9:09 am
Brown, 2011 U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:24 pm
In Mastafa v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:45 am
De Steno, 2019 U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 12:15 am
Even if we assume that the Lanham Act takes priority over the U.S. ratification of the treaty, the prior use could void the mark under the Lanham Act (although perhaps it's too late for the ARC to make this argument).The ARC could even argue that the red cross is not trademarkable because it is very nearly the flag of Switzerland. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:59 am
Spot the First Amendment problem with that [Ilya Shapiro and Michael Collins on Cato merits amicus brief in case of U.S. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:34 pm
In Lyon et al. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 3:41 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:14 pm
Danisco US Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:08 pm
The justices called for the views of the U.S. solicitor general in Midwest Air Traffic Control v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 1:39 pm
U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:31 am
U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 12:43 pm
Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 753, 513 A.2d 86, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994, 107 S. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 3:56 pm
U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
Mayfield v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
Earlier this month, U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:59 am
Of course, that position stands in conflict with Marbury v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:23 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
