Search for: "***u. S. v. Wells"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 4,285
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
Additionally, the factual portion and any accompanying depositions must provide reasonable cause to believe the defendant committed the offense charged, as well as nonhearsay factual allegations of an evidentiary character which, if true, establish every element of the offense charged and defendant's commission thereof (CPL 100.15[3] & 100.40[1]; see People v Dumas, 68 NY2d 729 [1986]; see also People v Alejandro, 70 NY2d 133 [1987]). [read post]
21 May 2015, 5:19 pm
See Spenser v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Committee for a Better Arvin v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 2:55 am
Plessy’s place in the list of worst Supreme Court decisions Looking back at the Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:30 am
The court’s decision in Elkind v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:44 pm
S. 476, 483 (1957), defamation, Beauharnais v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:00 am
In Young v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm
These include demands for urgent action to improve equipment for troops fighting in Iraq as well as appeals on the availability of alternative herbal medicines in the UK. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:00 am
Here the applicant [Applicant] for certification as a school bus had disclosed that he had been convicted of two drug-related felonies as well as three theft-related misdemeanors, the most recent in 1993, when Applicant was 41 years old. [read post]
13 May 2015, 12:51 pm
In this case, however, plaintiff alleges that the use of its mark was in Assara’s advertisement itself, as well as on the face of Assara’s website. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:01 pm
While there is authority that states that the government’s broad authority at the border extends to those exiting the country as well as to those coming in, United States v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:58 am
Polysemous meaning may well need other interpretations against which to define itself, but I see no requisite connection to hierarchy.) [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:14 am
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 5:21 am
Transportation Insurance Company, supra.The Court of Appeals goes on to explain that[i]n two detailed and well-reasoned opinions, the district court concluded that the Policy did not cover Metro's loss and, thus, that TIC was entitled to summary judgment on Metro's breach of contract claim. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
Video surveillance footage at some of the victim stores showed him committing the crime, as well. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 pm
S. 476, 483 (1957), defamation, Beauharnais v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 3:27 pm
Williamson v Khan. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
"We have considered MPEP(v) and note that all address the issue of enablement of a written description under 35 USC, first paragraph. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:36 pm
Mach Mining LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Leach Builders, LLC v. [read post]
