Search for: "50 Doe Defendants" Results 2261 - 2280 of 7,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
2018 was another busy busy year in the world of copyright, and a continuing global 'theme' was the ongoing battle between 'big tech' and 'big content', with the likes of Google and YouTube continuing to lobby extensively against planned reforms, bringing onboard (some) of the creative community - whilst the  'big content' (including film companies, music companies, the games sector and television) rolled out other creators - and finally seemed to be… [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
The Court held that the plain language of Rule 702 does not memorialize Frye; rather the rule requires an epistemic warrant for the opinion testimony of expert witnesses. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:56 pm by Florian Mueller
However, the court didn't require $1.5B only to cause a liquidity cost of maybe $30-$50 million. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
The degree to which state tax provisions conform to the federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) varies, as does the version of that code to which they conform. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 10:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Simply put, Defendant does not contradict the contention that the nunchaku's primary use, which Defendant concedes is as "a tool from the sphere of martial arts," is a lawful one.... [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 8:18 am by NZB
Not wearing a seat belt significantly increases the chances of you sustaining more serious and fatal injuries by 50%. [read post]
For example, theft of property valued at less than $50 is considered a Class C Misdemeanor, while theft valued at more than $50 but less than $150 is a Class B Misdemeanor. [read post]
For example, theft of property valued at less than $50 is considered a Class C Misdemeanor, while theft valued at more than $50 but less than $150 is a Class B Misdemeanor. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 3:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  This means that a Section 17(b) violation does not require a finding of fault (such as negligence or tortious intent). [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:48 pm by Dan Murphy
Precisely what does a Colorado prosecutor have to prove “beyond a reasonable doubt” in order to convict a defendant who has been accused of shoplifting? [read post]